Egyptian court bans YouTube for a month
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
As a person of Latin American heritage I don't want anyone to be arrested for saying Chicano or Cucaracha. I can handle offenses. Muslims should be able to do the same.
In short, his thesis: my Muslim brothers and sisters, we are nothing. I am not going waste time talking more about it more than has already been repeated countless times, but suppose we wake up and all the Muslims are gone. Will scientific research stop? Will any technology and medicine production cease? Will anyone miss Muslim society as a whole for its contributions back? No. And that is what we should worry about.
Ironically, he wrote this editorial months ago in reaction to the same video that got YouTube banned very recently. I show this as to not kid the people who come here into thinking Egyptians want censorship and cannot handle the though of someone offending them (this article mocks this viewpoint at length), it is just you must realize English is not the native language (only the ruling elite) or this is huge intellectual movement against most of these things. Unlike the ruling party and more conservative elements, they are focused internally and not externally to work on their image. Take it as you want.
[1] http://tahrirnews.com/columns/view.aspx?cdate=19092012&i...
Where I live (Brazil) there are, regrettably, a lot more restrictions to free speech than in the U.S.. But I don't think one error is justification for another one.
> free speech is restricted if it is directed to lead to "imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"
Ok, I can accept this. But I don't understand how mocking a religion leads to "imminent lawless action".
-General George S. Patton
Sincerely, Guy who converted, studied Arabic for 6+ years, has master coursework on Arabic, Islamic studies, Middle East history, and knows this is utter bullshit. And calling an Egyptian an Arab is an insult these days; it is associated with people in the Gulf, and they are not viewed positively, much like a local version of Americans who use their wealth to interfere in local politics and make over generalizations about their interests that they do not understand go figure.
Get off my lawn.
Anyone's opinion on the system of islam, no matter how horrible or even disgusting they find it, does not constitute a racist opinion, obviously. Claiming that islam itself is the main reason for the current state of muslim countries is merely stating the obvious, and is no more racist a statement than that communism seems to have failed.
As somebody who's studied law, let me just say that I fully agree that islam is a horrible system. Islam itself, imho, also fits any reasonable definition of racism due to (amongst other things) the laws that openly discriminate based on skin color, religion, and sex. And it's a law system that was rightfully considered archaic in the dark ages, when it was created. It is stupid for giving power of life and death to people who are loosely specified and giving blanket reasons for "the state" to kill people (google "3 reasons to kill a muslim", "dhimma", "women testify islam" for a basic introduction to these issues).
Aside from that, the central figure of islam, the "prophet" is a paedophile, a thief, a mass-murderer, a rapist, a slave-trader, someone who kidnapped innocents into slavery, torturer, and plenty worse. That's the figure islamic "holy" texts describe.
-- Have your read the history of 20th Century Warfare?
It's like saying my opponent is a muffin-eater, and we all know that muffin eaters are to be despised, so his statement about cats is incorrect.
Do you believe that all anti-semites make invalid points about the world? Or is it true that ONLY NON anti-Semitic people can say true things?
It doesn't matter if George S Patton just got done eating 15 babies for lunch. His argument stands/falls on its own weight. Attack his argument directly, not make a political attack against his person and dismiss his argument that way.