I find it odd that you link to a project that hasn't seen an update in the last 12 years. How old does a project have to be before it is considered "dead"?
The project is certainly dead, but it's also historically significant.
It's impossible and immoral to have two projects with the same name. How dare they.
Well maybe, but from the outside they look like really similar projects (just different languages).
Last modified in April of 2000. Y'know, back when we used Perl willingly.
Looks like topaz.sf.net was a 3-month, early alpha post-perl-5 experiment twelve years ago.
The fact that it used the name "Topaz" should have absolutely no bearing on any current project.
The link goes to a project last committed to in 2000. You surely can't be objecting for that reason.