AT&T Fails The SXSW iPhone Test
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
They showed me the emails they sent back and forth with John Donovan (AT&T CTO) about the issue, and said they worked like mad to increase capacity.
(BTW, according to the sig files in his emails, looks like John Donovan is on an iPhone.)
Apple also had stipulated very strict and unusual terms regarding revenue. AT&T was smart to see the upside potential of a radically new device causing users to switch to their network -- again, something that Verizon ignored. You have to give AT&T credit. Even though they have a horrible network, they are very strategically savvy.
Here is the whole story: http://thewickedwoman.com/2007/07/08/why-apple-chose-att-for...
Oh, wait, they do! It's in testing with their own employees. See:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Femtocells-in-2009-99...
Not deploying a few to SXSW would seem a major blunder and lost opportunity -- unless the units are currently so awful they'd be even worse then the current complaints.
OTOH, T-Mobile is fine and the wi-fi works well (which is impressive with ~3,000 simultaneous clients).
If the femtocells are to work in an urban environment, they'll have to work with many to a city block -- or even single apartment building. That is, about the same density as wifi access points. I can see 7 SSIDs right now from my kitchen table; from the roof of my building I can see 20-something. (Of course only a fraction of these are usefully connectable.)
So why not a femtocell in the ACC everywhere there's a wifi access point? That would seem to mirror the best case for deployment once they're for sale to home users.
Or at least a half-dozen in the corners of the venue? So at least a few people can report back about islands of good coverage?