Sometimes, I hate reading news from nytimes. For example, in this article, there is no a single link actually pointing to Kosmix website.
Or, we are expected to find out the website ourselves by reading the article?
Or, we are expected to find out the website ourselves by reading the article?
I work there, and our team spent a bunch of time on friday trying to get them to add the link. They claim they still haven't figured out implications of this 'internet' thing on their editorial policies, and trained all their copywriters..
Their excuse is that the CMS makes it difficult to add outbound links directly into articles.....
...so they instead fill them with automatic inbound links to their spammy topic pages!
The NYTimes was the first paper on the 'net. Brewster Khale (founder of Internet Archive) helped them get there. In 2004 they started threatening the Internet Archive to get them to stop archiving their internet pages.
Then they started threatening Google. Then they put up the registration wall. But then they started paying "reputation" companies to spread their links all over the web. Then they started protesting that they should not have the burden of being the "paper of record", but still maintain "all the news that's fit to print".
The Old Grey Lady has gone batty.