Show HN: A beautiful and open-source paste service
paste.pm
paste.pm
A couple things I would add would probably be some way to do syntax highlighting and a quick button to create a new paste from any page. Clicking the bottom left logo will do that, but it's not terribly obvious at first.
So, yeah, I like this a lot. Kudos.
EDIT: I see the syntax highlighting now, I just hadn't triggered it yet.
Thanks for the kudos!
relevant bug: https://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/issues/detail...
Next time, click on the "link" link next to a post you wish to reply to, and it will give you a reply option
PS: Nice tip, I'm still new to Hacker News :-)
But the frontend guy is kind of busy so we reckoned it's better to release without that rather than not releasing at all :)
The most recent data I could find (2010) puts it at around 2% in the US. I would venture that 2% should be considered uncommon.
http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2010/10/how-many-...
Another thing to take into consideration regarding this sort of stats is the user base. I _think_ a lot of the NoJS (or the likes) users are of the tech-savvy bunch and more likely to use sites like this one. So, I _think_ a more relevant percentage of people that have JS disabled is higher in this case.
Calling this an utter failure is total hyperbole. Okay, so the site doesn't gracefully degrade. That's a failure for best practices. But best practice isn't always so black and white and a site that doesn't degrade gracefully isn't always absolutely an utter failure. Consider the target audience of this. It'll be more technically inclined people. It's again safe to assume these people will mostly have JS enabled and most people won't have a problem. Even beyond that, we're not talking about a website that's trying to capture the hearts and minds of the entire Internet using population who'd ever want to use a Pastebin. It's some guy or girl who put together a beautiful side project and open sources it at that.
But in the end whether you're right or wrong, have a good point or not, just doesn't matter. It's this pervasive culture of seeking out and focusing only on what's wrong with a project around here that seriously needs to stop. There was a project on the font page last night that wasn't the most impressive piece of code but served a cool purpose and the overwhelming majority of comments just wanted to tear it down and call it useless. It was pretty disgusting really because the project wasn't useless at all. It was just that the commenters didn't personally have a use for it and for some reason couldn't see anything beyond their own personal preferences as if they thought the entire world did (or should) have their same tastes or something. This needs to stop. If it doesn't we'll either no longer get anyone submitting their cool projects or all of HN will be overrun with over zealous critics or both.
I and many other people still use lynx/elinks. Which is not to say that I expect every service to work on a text browser, but to dismiss text browsers for a service catering to developers is a bit presumptive
"Consider the target audience of this. It'll be more technically inclined people. It's again safe to assume these people will mostly have JS enabled."
I disagree with that sentiment completely. The target audience for this is people who're most likely to be (sensibly, imo) running with NoScript or with JS completely off.
Given that, and given the site is implementing a function that doesn't require JS /at all/, to not even have the page throw an error message is pretty lousy in my books.
Absolute rubbish
I work in a huge place that holds almost 2000 developers ranging in many different languages, skillsets and areas. I've yet to meet 1 who surfs with JS switched off.
Maybe this was the case in the early 2000s, but certainly not now. Get with the times.