Hacker News Reader

I'm talking about the interview, where he specifically said (and I paraphrase) "fomenting is against the law, but I did it anyways because the SEC is clueless."

That was just one of a couple of crimes he admitted too, and I cite this one because he specifically said "I committed a crime."

What more do you need?

View on HN

Evidence. If he goes on trial he could plead the fifth and prosecutor will need evidence to corroborate whether he actually did what he said.

How about some evidence that either of you actually knows the relevant law and evidence showing that his actions actually qualify? You need both. His statements aren't either.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com