While I can imagine some situations where I would definitely agree, I'm not sure this is one (I'm not sure it isn't either; I don't have all the details). I think he's entitled to vent in his personal life without presuming it will affect his work, and since people's private lives are increasingly public, the lines of visibility and freedom are under pressure to move. I think I'd rather those lines move in the direction of increased individual rights and free expression than the other way, but I'm OK with an "assessment" of his supposed "crimes against humanity" as long it isn't a substitute for rational judgement and is allowed to conclude dispassionately that he's not breaching anyone's privacy or other rights, if true. I don't think it's enough that CRA doesn't like it... At face value it seems harmless. (I might be inclined to call him immature though... Obviously most people's jobs feel like banging your head on a table; do something else if you can, but publicly resenting people just asks for the same in return. And so on...)

In what world could this ever be considered a thing that shouldn't be opposed?