Yahoo's Mayer Steadies Ship
online.wsj.com
online.wsj.com
This, while I was waiting to see which photo service would finally kill flickr. The final nail in the coffin so to speak. Pleasantly surprised.
"Spin your phone clockwise 3 times and lick the screen to prove you're not a robot"
I also had to change my Yahoo! password for Flickr a while back, and I think the maximum length of my password was still at ~32 characters ... and there's not two-factor authentication to boot.
Yahoo! is very AOL-like still, which is one of those things I really, really hope Meyer can do away with.
Way more sophisticated than that. Think in terms of emulation, simulation, HTTP spoofing, etc.
Maybe this is just my first real WebView experience with a log-in process. I just wonder how there isn't an alternative (besides a native app).
This is the honeymoon period though, let's wait and see. Yahoo is easily pressured by a few hedge funds, so Mayer will have to deliver result$ soon enough I fear.
If you think Google doesn't play to Wall Street, just count the number of ads on the pages (or the number on non-ads, it's just easier) and major search "updates"
[1]: http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/10/as-marissa-mayer-annoys-inv...
It's still a bit cluttered and messy looking in the UI department (and some things only work in FF not Chrome), but after 15 minutes I had 90% of my iGoogle page set back up almost exactly like my original.
This could be an easy way for her to get constant eyeballs on Yahoo! as I go to my iGoogle page at least 20 times a day.
"Hey let's get rid of the service we have that requires almost no engineering resources and brings people to google multiple times per day!"
Outside of myYahoo there's an homage to iGoogle
and here's a bunch of alternatives
http://www.howtogeek.com/129155/6-alternatives-to-igoogle-fo...
Unless Yahoo plans on becoming a actual Journalistic organization, like the New York Times,Bloomberg, ABCNews or USA Today they cannot claim to be a content company.
Yahoo needs to pick, Technology or Content. Apple, Google, Microsoft and even Facebook have already decided. They distribute a lot of content but they are firmly in the technology business and there isn't much confusion about that.
I know that's vague, but isn't that the bundle of buzzwords every clueless Fortune 500 company wants to use 2013? No doubt Mayer can execute it better than most, but I'm wondering what Yahoo's advantage is over anyone else. What do they bring to the table?