http://www.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/Lar...
http://www.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/Lar...
Think about it. If a corporation employs 1 million employees, and that company fails, then the economy will most definitely take a hit. On top of this, that company would hold far too much power and could use the power of the number of people working for it to force governments into doing things that it wouldn't do for the greater good. It happens already now with big business, but just imagine what it would be like with a million employee business!
Is there some kind of intervention that you'd advocate that wouldn't devastate the company?
On top of this, I'm not really sure I care if Walmart does fail. What I'm saying is that if it does, then that single participant will have suddenly massively increased unemployment simply by no longer being a going concern. Again, that's not healthy for an economy. Many smaller or medium sized players would probably be a healthier thing for the U.S. economy.
In a vacuum, no, but how can you be sure that the aggregate value of cheaper retail goods for Walmart's shoppers wasn't better for the U.S. economy?
And it's not as if U.S. manufacturing output has shrunk. It's still the greatest in the world, though obviously we're not making as many consumer goods as 20 or 30 years ago.
Many smaller or medium sized players would probably be a healthier thing for the U.S. economy.
There are at least half a dozen smaller or medium size competitors for Walmart shoppers' dollars. Take a look at the performance of Costco vs. Walmart, for example. The former has competed exceedingly well by playing the game very differently in some respects, while also being smart and efficient in a way that much of the pre-Walmart retail landscape wasn't.