“special oversight”? What does that mean?
How would such a reunification compare to, say, East and West Germany?
How would such a reunification compare to, say, East and West Germany?
The movie 'The Lives of Others' was motivated by the filmmakers' desire to smack down the Ostalgie-types achieving popularity in Germany. It is common there to see shops selling East German themed stuff, and there is at least one chain of shops solely dedicated to East German paraphernalia. Polls suggest there is a real yearning in some areas to go back to the days where the secret police and rationing of basic goods were real things. It's bizarre.
I was not able to find a single person saying, please send back the STASI, it was better with.
You must only accept that early 2000, the bubble crashed, the complete economy went out of track and that just 10 years after the reunification. They did not had the time to taste the good working capitalism.
My father lived in various bits of East Germany during the communist era. He had nothing to say but good things about the situation, until he pissed off a couple of Stasi in the late 1970s that was and was deported to the West after a fairly light telling off (fortunately versus locked up). The main thing that pissed him off about this is that he had just bought a new Robotron TV that he spent two years saving up for and had to leave it behind. He is bitter about this to the day :)
If it wasn't for the Stasi, it would have been a modern Utopia. Stable employment, manufacturing oriented economy (value added everywhere) and could pretty much stand alone. They even pushed family values and equality for all over conspicuous consumption, which is pretty much the entire facade of capitalism these days.
This ALL went down the shitter at reunification.
Perhaps someone should try it again (without the Stasi that is).
Some Ostalgie: I have three bottles of Vita Cola in the cupboard (that stuff rocks) and a Praktica MTL 5 camera which I use regularly - I find these to be the essence of the good bits of the GDR :)
Dragged through the courts for using Facebook and Twitter, held indefinitely without trial under the Terrorism Act, all the technology is imported from the communist far East, low quality things with a contract attached, luxury as a form of class ego via conspicuous consumption, everyone works for the minimum wage in service industries, no incentive to do anything but live on state handouts.
Yet, although I think the EU would rather like us to be.
There was very little, if any freedom of expression or freedom of speech. Not very utopian.
Average citizens had their exposure to the outside world limited. Not very utopian.
Citizens lived in a very tightly controlled society. A society controlled by the government and secret police. Not my idea of utopia.
Even if the modern internet had existed then, it's doubtful that a citizen would even be allowed to come to a site like this and even have this discussion.
As far as the Stasi go, you can't just say "without them it would have been fine" because they are completely intertwined with that society. That society required very little or no dissent to continue and that is why the Stasi existed: To crush dissent and keep everyone thinking how wonderful their "utopian" existence was....
Perhaps there is a reason that a "Stasi" always ends up appearing in these kinds of societies?
The reason for Ostalgie is that if you didn't piss off the Stasi, you actually had a reasonable life. Also, since reunification, the West Germans have treated the East like a second class lepper colony and closed all their businesses down resulting in much pissed-off-ness.
Not very bizarre. Other things were also "real things", like job security, food for everyone (even if little), a sense of belonging, etc. And a far better culture (including a vibrant counter-culture against the regime) than the BS that the media serve today.
If you visit some places full of dirt poor families, abandoned buildings and meth addicts, you'll get a nice glimpse why some might want it another way.
Do you really think complete control over another human being is morally acceptable, even if it prevents that person from becoming a drug addict?
I mean, we could cure all drug addicts today by sending them to a prison camp with violent punishment for carrying drugs. But would that be preferable to actually having drug addicts?
We can achieve a lot of things with force. The question is if the force itself creates more destruction than it prevents.
Do you really think a complex political system like in a former socialist country, can be reduced to "complete control over another human being"?
The idea of capitalism, and with it the associated idea of having to compete for people's business, is still somewhat new to them, you see...