After Fires, Ban on phones and laptops looking possible on Boeing 787 flights
venturebeat.com
venturebeat.com
Article denies the headline... Move along.
The changes are even nicely highlighted in yellow.
Note especially the parts "This prohibition does not apply to: ... lithium batteries (rechargeable and non-rechargeable) covered by the Provisions for Dangerous Goods Carried by Passengers or Crew (see 2.3.2 to 2.3.5 and Table 2.3.A)." (That's for Cathay Pacific Airways, but the others are essentially the same.)
The "Provisions for Dangerous Goods Carried by Passengers or Crew", Table 2.3.A is at http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/cargo/dgr/Documents/DG-Passenge... . It says:
You may have "Lithium ion battery powered equipment containing batteries over 100 Wh but not exceeding 160 Wh." as carry-on, in checked-baggage, and on ones person.
You may have "Spare lithium ion batteries with a Watt-hour rating exceeding 100 Wh but not exceeding 160 Wh for consumer electronic devices. Maximum of two spare batteries may be carried in carry-on baggage only. These batteries must be individually protected to prevent short circuits." Note that these are not permitted in checked baggage.
None of this has changed. The only things that have changed are how to handle lithium metal batteries as cargo.
And to the person who posted this, and the people who thought it might be affecting them - the article was oozing with Betteridge's law. There's no information, but the writer ran with it anyway, inserting a "?" for CYA power. "The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bollocks, and don’t actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it."