I'm proud to have him as a Senator.
I'm proud to have him as a Senator.
When a politician does something right - and Cornyn's letter asks far more pointed and on-point questions than I expected - the correct response is not to bring up everything you feel the politician has ever done wrong.
My views, your views, and Cornyn's views about gay marriage aren't particularly relevant here.
You're blasting Corynyn because you don't agree with his politics. Fine. But that has absolutely nothing to do with anything here.
Are you bringing up something from 2005 to kick dirt over the rightness of Senator Cornyn's current actions? Whatever could be the point of this, besides counter-productive partisanship? Can a right action be taken only by people with pasts you deem fully worthy?