Also, you confuse quality (good) and fragility. Most of the stuff I have is very high quality, which is why I use it every day and I don't have to worry about it falling apart.
Also, you confuse quality (good) and fragility. Most of the stuff I have is very high quality, which is why I use it every day and I don't have to worry about it falling apart.
The reality is knowledge is even cheaper than food these days, and books are backbreaking whenever you move. A rational cost/benefit analysis will tell you to rid yourself of books before clothes. A favourite shirt is nearly irreplaceable, a favourite book can be replaced in a day.
I almost added books as a third category above.
A year ago I had 10,000 books. Now I have 5,000.
It'd be nice to cut that in half every year for a few years. There's no reason I can't get it down to 500 or 1,000 WITH EASE.
Even better: Request a copy from the local library, and you'll get it for free, and be rid of it when you're done.
Do that a few times a month, and after a few years you end up with full bookshelves :)
That's the thing- I own many, many books (CLRS, Tufte's work, Graphics Programming Black Book, and dozens of others in the same vein) that I'm never really "done" with because I refer to them at least several times a year. As a researcher/engineer/professional, they're as valuable to me as some of other of my tools (computer, arduino, breadboard, etc.).
I suspect that that's what Paul implies in his essay, and that he refers to such books rather than "50 shades of grey".
(but sure, when it comes to novels or such books, yeah you can just give them away after you've read them).
You can also rip out and burn each page as you go along, as a Spanish writer had his protagonist do habitually. I shuddered the first time I came across that, but it may have its advantages ...
(Detective Pepe Carvalho in books by Manuel Vázquez Montalbán. Only book-reading detective that comes to mind besides Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe. Also cooks, if memory serves.)