Networking Inside a Large Company
blog.smitpatel.com
blog.smitpatel.com
Can we ditch the 'hustle', though? Some things, like asking the CEO to lunch, seem like 'hustle' because they're obvious but 'hard'. This wiki page was a very clever idea more than it was hard work, I think it kind of demonstrates how the term has grown out of control.
As for the 'large' company, I think his definition is valid. Where I am now we're approaching 200 employees, and it's well beyond the point where everyone knows each other (there is a term for this limit). Even for 400 people, the traditional 'meet at the watercooler' methods break down, and you need to inject some innovation to meet everyone.
Personally, I like to use Dunbar's number as a the divide between small and large companies.
I think these recommendations are too vague for truly large organizations like Google, Cisco, MSFT etc...
We quip a lot about the disadvantages of large companies. There is, however, one major advantage: transfer opportunity (even though the formal transfer system of most companies should be a last resort; you're better off being requested) and the chance to make contacts. However, to actually get at that, you need to be a bit more "entrepreneurial" and self-motivated (to meet people and ask them about what they're doing) than the typical big-company employee.
Another upshot of this is that if you do it right, people won't fuck with you and you're very well insured against being personally fired or PIP'd. You might be laid off if there's a huge cut, and your boss might tell you that it's time to transfer, but personally firing someone who is well networked within the company is so politically dangerous that most people won't fuck with you.