Most of his gripes seem to be coming from the software UI. All these problems seem readily addressable, there are numerous EMR systems out there with vastly different UIs, some more intuitive than others. It's a shame that his article seems to suggest that ALL EMRs suffer and will always suffer from these problems.

It's amazing how many don't see software as something that's malleable and can be suited to their needs. Hopefully an EMR manufacturer will publicly respond to these concerns, else this can become the general view of EMRs if for no other reason than a quick Google search on EMRs will likely result in this article, thus giving any opposer the necessary ammunition for an argument.