National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
suicidepreventionlifeline.org
suicidepreventionlifeline.org
I suspect there are depressed people who may ultimately kill themselves who, if there were some number solely for "suicidal people", would never call, but would be likely to call "call for any reason", and then get access to mental health care in addition to whatever the phone operator gives them.
Nice to see that somehow the MIT administration fucked up Nightline, too, so it's closed for a year. Good job guys!
I don't really think the solution is more hotlines, even generalized ones because you have to want to get help every single time. I think the solution is to shine so much light on mental illness it loses all of the mystery and stigma and becomes as widely discussed and debated as the following 'mentally healthy' ways to kill yourself or someone else:
- Euthanasia, or "mercy" killing because we are glad someone's suffering has ended
- Abortion, literally deciding to end another person's life who is incapable of asking you not to
And of course, the preferred method of suicide that most people will use:
- a slow poison of shitty diets and deadly vices
We never even discussed mental illness or even suicide in high school like we did ethical dilemmas.
And the number is on the back of every student ID, which means anyone can find their number really easily.
The biggest problem seems to have been that word got out about it outside the MIT community, so that they were getting many calls from non-MIT people. But, their policy was to try to help anyone they could: http://tech.mit.edu/V130/N43/nightline.html
Maybe it would have been better to change the policy than to scrap the whole service.
(BTW I was one of the first Nightline staffers back in 1978.)
Your arrogance is truly breathtaking. I can't believe people shit on other's majors and college choices like this.
The man's point was that it is not suitable for a technical institution like that to be managed and administered by non-technical people. There are a number of reasons for that but the main one is that they lack the expertise needed to run such a place and can't fully appreciate the culture of hacking that many such institutes were built upon.
Same goes for companies. The most successful software companies out there are those run by engineers. Think Google. When "business people" take over, things often have a way of turning for worse. I've seen it time and again.
(the idea is probably a MIT undergrad or grad student who then goes to another school or business for some kind of management experience, then eventually returns to MIT, like some of the best administrators; or, a professor who also does admin functions. Professional administrators have grown in number dramatically faster than enrollment, which is part of why tuition is so high. We don't need ~50 deans.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/251220.php
There are also some novel NMDA antagonists (same mechanism as Ketamine) in the works, which come with less perception alterations, the names of which escape me, which will change things for the better for a lot of people.
I can't see how in many of these situations a controlled drug is going to help. We could only administer ketamine to those who exhibit depression or suicidal tendencies, but sadly these signs are not always visible or picked up.
E.g. X% of people have been dissuaded by suicide attempts after speaking to a suicide hotline.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1521/suli.33.4.400.252... - "Independent raters measured callers' suicidality and mental state at the beginning and end of 100 taped counselling sessions. Changes in suicidality and mental state were measured using a reliable rating scale developed for the study. Significant decreases in suicidality and significant improvement in mental state were found to occur during the course of counselling sessions, suggesting positive immediate impact."
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.33... - "Significant decreases in suicidality were found during the course of the telephone session, with continuing decreases in hopelessness and psychological pain in the following weeks."
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1022269314076... - "Outcome measures showed observer evaluations of decreased depressive mood from the beginning to the end in 14% of calls, decreased suicidal urgency ratings from the beginning to the end in 27% of calls, and reaching a contract in 68% of calls, of which 54% of contracts were upheld according to follow-up data."
In case people don't know this: these hotlines also help people who are concerned about friends and family members, and there are email-based options like http://www.samaritans.org/.
A friend of mine worked for one for a while. She says it is a mixed bag, you win a lot, you lose some too. It's the toughest thing anybody could pick to do as a job. She's a pretty successful businesswoman and decided to take a years break and looked for something useful to do, ended up manning one of the phones.
Anecdotally I worked as a part-time volunteer on a general counselling service for a couple of years in my twenties - which included some suicide calls. A goodly chunk of the time it felt like you made a difference. We occasionally got "thank you" calls weeks/months later to say that we'd stopped folk doing things that they would now regret (sometimes from folk you thought you hadn't helped...)
Just my two cents.
I'm very grateful that you volunteered with them, but I'm really curious what conclusion we're supposed to draw from your experience. At worst it sounds slightly dismissive of the line and the people who call.
It may be what is called 'empathy'.
Looks like I got it from a Freakonomics podcast [1]: "One academic study looked at attempted suicides in Houston among 15 to 34 year olds. It found that in 70 percent of the cases, the time between deciding to commit suicide and taking action was under an hour. Seventy-percent of the cases. For about one-quarter of the people involved, the time gap was five minutes or less."
Of course, from this it doesn't follow that a hotline it necessarily effective. Luckily britta already posted links to some studies.
[1] http://www.freakonomics.com/2011/06/21/the-suicide-paradox-f...
There is nothing to stop a person from going to several shops, but the measure is effective because that takes longer.
The people on these lines are very well trained at active listening, and that can be useful in a lot of mental health situations where suicide may never have been the end result.
One of these requirements is any story involving to suicide or mental health must be accompanied by information about 24-hour crisis support services http://www.mindframe-media.info/for-media/adding-helplines-t...
"Hearing about a suicide seems to make those who are vulnerable feel they have permission to do it" -- David Phillips https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copycat_suicide
Unfortunately http://www.reddit.com/r/Music/comments/16e15s/i_transcribed_... was posted and front-paged yesterday.
Google returns a local suicide prevention line number when you google suicide. Perhaps social media sites should discourage posting on the subject at the time of submission, or trying to wrap such content with reminder to the readership that they matter.
Are there even universal things to say? Perhaps somebody religious needs to hear "god loves you no matter what", whereas I for example found solace in thinking about atheism and evolution theory. Probably the first talks are not even about such things, rather about convincing the person that most problems are solvable and that they can get help?
As programmers we're able to control how our code behaves, but life on the other hand has too many variables, most of which are beyond one's control - and the only thing one can control is their lives. The will to live can do amazing wonders, but when that will fades -- life doesn't make sense, its just a waste of time and resources.
Guess who is most likely to be a programmer?
Looking at the available UE data from eurostat[0] the ratio would seem more 4:1, which obviously still confirms your point, I am just curious about your source.
[0] http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?t...
The problem with human interactions and ease of anxiety is that you will probably never be able to get a proper and useful metric.
I'd say most depressive people would not fill a form after calling any help hotline.
http://lessig.tumblr.com/post/40347463044/prosecutor-as-bull...
What to Lawrence may be 'a reason' to many of us is not: you are valuable even in jail.
So we try to find a better explanation than 'as he did not want to go to jail, he decided to kill himself', which is quite simplistic.