900 foot-wide asteroid to make close approach to Earth today
independent.ie
independent.ie
There is some level of uncertainty with the estimates because the asteroid's orbit will change in 2029. But even if the estimates are off by a couple orders of magnitude in the worst case, we are still looking at a very small probability.
But at least, if detected early enough, an asteroids path can be changed. If a star goes supernova within a few million light years of Earth, we'd all be fried.
Despite how mind boggling big space is, world extinction events are worryingly easy.
/me is pretty sure he'll have nightmares tonight...
[1] http://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-2012-da14-will-pass-very-...
Space is big. The geostationary orbit has a diameter of 265000km, and there are something like 200 satellites up there.
The lower orbits have a lot of gunk on them, but this asteroid will only cross the geostationary orbit. It's pretty damn unlikely it will hit anything.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/deflecting-an-asteroid-wi...
In order to further understand this, and forgive me here if it sounds strange, would a flat black car essentially be 'faster' than a gloss white car due to lack of reflection?
A larger, related effect is visible with this desk toy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crookes_radiometer
see: the pockmarked surface of the moon, which still has a stable orbit.
Clearly, the whole system is our domain, and we should be know events like this are not to be ignored, as they are way bigger than your average metropolitan housing millions of you and me.
Impacts _much_ larger than this one have happened many times over the course of our planet's history, and have had no significant impact on our orbit.
It's Level 1 on the Torino impact hazard scale.
The close approach in 2029 will substantially alter the object's orbit, making predictions uncertain without more data.
If it hits Earth, then it's 500 megatons of TNT going off.
If it passes through a half mile "keyhole" which is unlikely, it will hit Earth in 2036.
Apophis broke the record for the highest level on the Torino Scale, being, for only a short time, a level 4, before it was lowered.
So worst case scenario: it hits the half mile keyhole and in 2036 the equivalent of a nuclear weapon (10 tsar bomba's at once) goes off on a certain city. But there is a plot twist. There will be weeks of warning, and the risk area where it will hit will be narrowed to the size of half the earth, or if we use the science, maybe a whole continent.
So it'll be like a hurricane evacuation, but instead of one state, it will be quarter of the earth's surface. Imagine the logistical nightmare if that happened near India/china. The prospect of relocating 5 billion people within 2 weeks notice with all of their junk and to do it sustainably? Plot for a cool sci fi movie there.
I imagine it would be much cheaper to send three rockets to slightly nudge it off its course.
Instead of deflecting the whole asteroid, you're suggesting chipping it into a bunch of pieces and deflecting those somewhere. Same problem.
De-aggregating the asteroid via mining does nothing to the net momentum of the asteroid. It would take just as much energy to re-orbit 1000 or 1,000,000 chunks of an asteroid as it would to re-orbit one. The energy transferred by multiple chunks of asteroid to the Earth is the same whether it arrives in one chunk or thousands.
The only thing that would possibly make sense would be to drive two parts of the asteroid in different orbits. The net momentum hasn't changed, but the two pieces would split the difference and pass to either side of earth, possibly missing crucial "keyhole" orbits which would dictate a subsequent impact, though you could likely accomplish the same thing by exerting a small thrust against the entire mass over a long time.
Mining doesn't change the fundamental orbital mechanics or energy costs.
Otherwise I don't see your point.
10 tonnes is 1/2,700,000 the total mass of the asteroid.
This would be the equivalent of trying to reduce the impact of a 180 lb human by trying to reduce his mass by 0.001 oz (or 82 kg man by 0.03 grams for civilized humans).
Too small to matter.
The difference is that you're distributing the initial shock over a larger area (and possibly longer time period). Any sufficiently large strike would create similar results by way of ejecta which would be thrown from the impact site and re-enter the atmosphere and strike the planet elsewhere.
You might be able to avoid certain order-of-magnitude effects, such as piercing the crust and exposing the mantle, but at that scale of impact, it's pretty much assured to be a bad day regardless.