On the other hand, if you could lease a car at a subsidized price in exchange for ads, that might be an attractive offer to some.
On the other hand, if you could lease a car at a subsidized price in exchange for ads, that might be an attractive offer to some.
Once you got past all the requirements these 'ads' would have to adhear to, to not be distracting or dangerous, it becomes a pretty limp form of advertising.
The reason people own nice dash-systems, and iPods is so they dont have to listen to ads. There is absolutely no way anyone would buy a car that forces ads on them unless it was HEAVILY subsidized.
This is beyond retarded, and if advertising really is their motivation, this will fail hard.
Why isnt having a cool fancy dashboard without ads enough? Doesn't that do enough to make the car desirable, and competitive?
YOU ARE PASSING A GAS STATION. PLEASE STOP AND BUY IT.
YOU ARE PASSING A SANDWICH SHOP. PLEASE SWERVE LEFT AND BUY SANDWICH.
5 POINTS IF YOU CHANGE TO THE FAR RIGHT LANE!
This had me in stitches, I can't help feel something of this nature is a plausible outcome.
Actually, everytime I visit countries with billboards on highway, it seems really bizarre and stupid to place ads next to highways.
http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2012/08/would_yo...
Ford's developer page and its press release concern themselves with apps of the type they already bundle with Sync (i.e., ad-free). Indeed, Ford's developer page warns that content which distracts the driver (including but not limited to visual distractions) will not be accepted into the Sync app store.