Lenovo reveals 27-inch touchscreen AIO-tablet Windows 8 PC
neowin.net
neowin.net
And it's $1700 and comes with a HDD. The optional SSD is 64GB.
And the intended use case is your five year olds painting on it? WHAT.
It's not meant to be something you put under your arm, but for it to be your family's main computer. And is portable within the house, e.g., set up in the kitchen or the living room -- w/o requiring power. And can also be used as a tabletop computer.
I wanted a Sony Vaio Tap 20, but I may hold out for this now.
The Android emulation though is not needed. Toss that.
In fact, Uwe Schmidt, one of the most forward-thinking electronic musicians in the business, said in the mid-90s that something exactly like this would be his ideal music tool. He was just 15 years too early.
OK, found the press release. It's running Windows 8, then a custom UI shell when laying flat.
Apps are from a Lenovo-rebranded Intel AppUp store, Bluestack Android, and the Windows App Store. Also includes a handful of custom electronic gameboard pieces, and it comes pre-loaded with Miscellaneous Other Stuff.
Ships summer, $1,699 base price likely.
This sounds like a UX apocalypse, but if everything's properly bound into the Windows 8 Metro UI, maybe it'll feel seamless.
Gods, I don't know. I'd strangle for a 30" table iPad, so there has to be something to this concept. But a two inch thick iMac with a fan and HDD lying on its back? Arf.
The default HDD will be a physical HDD. A SSD is optional, at least according to the story.
The 1920x1080 screen resolution really needs to stop being the only choice as far as desktops.
EDIT: Although, too little resolution. This damn rMBP has ruined me for lower pixel density screens.
Why fake it? Drawing programs are very modal: You have one brush, with one set of properties. You have one selection you can move or operate on. One property sheet to edit. Etc. Except for games with their own interaction framework, most OSs assume one user with one selection in one document at a time. It may seem like a trivial change, but true realtime collaboration on a single screen seems to demand a UX system designed to support that.
Because the shot is setup to appear as if you're looking up at the girls from inside the device.
This is just an object lesson in why Windows 8 is an answer to a question nobody asked.
A quick and dirty extrapolation of iPad's design up by 5.2X gives you 7.5 pounds (and the obligatory 10mm thickness and 10 hour battery life). This doesn't have to be a fan-driven HDD-bearing poke-ass monstrosity. There must be software experiences that are materially better at these colossal sizes. And it's clearly technically possible... but the whole Windows hardware idiom is anchoring this down into goofy territory.
If it can be made "properly", does it have a place in the real world? I want the answer.
1. And it's clearly technically possible...
2. If it can be made "properly"...
Consider how hard it would be to turn any particular app that assumes a single user into one where two people can operate on the same "document" or "world" at the same time. I figure you need a UX system with that concept baked into it before you even start writing those apps.
Hallways in most of the US are required to be 36" wide. This should accommodate even the 39" diagonal screen currently being tested.
Most of your objections-as-questions seem similarly overblown.
IBM has also done fabulously well emulating various old mainframe operating systems.
Emulation strategies are never the be-all and end-all, but if you want to be a "successor for X", you need to have an emulation story.
Emulation, virtualization and dual-booting are a very large part of the reason of the success of OS X. A Mac is the only machine that will run OS9, OS X, Windows & Linux software. So people buy one knowing that they won't be stuck if they end up not liking OS X or needing a critical app. Then they end up staying on OS X.
So to be a successor to something, you need to:
1) have an emulation or virtualization story so that people won't be afraid to switch
2) be significantly better so people end up not actually using the emulation or virtualization.
Technically, you are incorrect. You can't run OS9 on the Intel machines and you can't run Windows on PPC machines.
You can probably find a decent "classic" option for intel macs if you look hard enough, but that wasn't the original point.
This is not like Xbox360 being able to run Xbox-1 games. This is like Xbox360 being able to run PS3 games. Big difference. I don't think Xbox360 would've been successful if they said "Here we have 5 games of our own, and 100 from PS3". I think most people would've still gone with the PS3, if it had that many games at that point compared to the Xbox360, instead of dealing with PS3 emulation for Xbox360 just to get those 5 extra games.
When I started using Linux, having a working DOS emulator was a very significant issue for me. Today, many Windows games work just fine under wine, not to mention actual applications.
I think it's a big deal for the changers.
Your criteria seem to be inconsistent.
I once bought a notebook with touchscreen, and even have tapped it a few times. In a while I have forgotten it had a touchscreen.
Downvote away (fan)boys...