Why do you feel compelled to proactively defend generative AI's honor when nobody was even impugning it in this case? Kinda strange behavior IMO.
If you really need references I can provide them.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50034962 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49999713 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50015053 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50021250 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50015906 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50028886 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50015320 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50016392 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50015082 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50015238 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50035922 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50033512 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50018662 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50001815 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49995247 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49988534 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49989698 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49977642 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49975797 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49973956 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49971051 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972751 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49965913 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49959175 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50003285 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027301 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50007609 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50037284 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49998313 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49954481
2. Judges for competitions see a lot of stuff - tend to do it quickly - and theres a lot of randomness to who wins. I also just think that judges are often fairly terrible - maybe the incentives just dont exist for getting good judges, especially for competitions (unlike the Nikon one of course) which are smaller e.g. design a poster for our country fair.
So its easy to see that 1. means that the ratio of slop to real can be very high and by 2. the judging process is typically partly random and pretty fallible, so its easy to see how slop can win.
On the judge point, slop appeals to the average and the average is very approachable - so its often the case that people actually prefer ai art to work that is produced from out of an individuals unique experience and vision, which takes more effort to engage with.
So I think by and large it is
Edit: I do think its an inditement of the competition when it happens though -- a better organised competition is going to deliver less slop (ai or human)
It is prejudice to insist otherwise.
I don’t apply the same criteria to things that are intended as non-realistic art, you can have non-slop AI graphics, as it doesn’t matter there. But in photography there’s an expectation that the subject is a real moment in time at a real place.