Your question seems like a non-sequitur. The article is about a fraudulent entry, but you're talking about a low quality (or perhaps low-effort) entry.
Real things can be low-quality, and counterfeits can be high-quality, they are separate measures.
Real things can be low-quality, and counterfeits can be high-quality, they are separate measures.
And yet here we have an example that is high quality. How can that be so?
Sounds like a sloppy way to win to me.
Thank you.
In order for it to be stripped of its first-place prize, it must have first won the first-place prize.
Here’s an easy to understand analogy; if you deposit a fake check for a million dollars, your account will briefly show a million dollars, but then the check bounces, and your balance goes back to what it was before because you were in fact never a millionaire.
AI slop because it cannot ever appreciate or under stand thing that has been created. It can only interpenetrate based of someone else's writings that has opinions on the subject. It is soulless vessel to create content for profit versus real art which is an extension of emotion.
Even pigs find slop useful and yet would find it less filling when they have a broader understanding of the world around them.
"In the beauty contest, the faked picture of a composite girl won! Therefore she is the most beautifulest even though she never existed in the first place! Checkmate, people who don't like my waifu!" /s
Quality and veracity are independent (orthogonal) axes, but we are used to them being correlated, so some people conflate the two.
A knock-off Chanel handbag likely won’t be as good quality as the original, but it could be even better! Even so, it wouldn’t be authentic.
You can make an ultra high quality fake check and deposit it and yet it will still bounce because it turns out the quality is irrelevant if it isn't real.
It also didn't win. By definition a disqualified entry is not a winning entry. That is what the entire article is about, if you read it! The winning entry is here: https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/2026-small-world-i...
My friend, it is the heart of the point I was raising. On my thread. So explain to me how the topic I raised about the quality is irrelevant to what I am saying?
> It also didn't win.
It won first place:
> The company has stripped an entry to its Small World In Motion competition of its first place prize.
In order to be stripped of a prize one must have first won the prize.
Are you an idiot or a troll? I can't tell.
And they can win competitions because photo competitions are usually already within the realm of derivative.
I said that it won.