Hacker News Reader

It’s not unreasonable to want OpenAI to be thorough and rigorously check their work before sharing it though. Sounds like that didn’t happen here.

If say 10% of papers have mistakes, I think they are thorough enough for this kind of volume and complexity.

10% is ridiculously high compared with published papers in math journals where the number of critical mistakes is near zero.

they don't claim journals quality, which doesn't make published proofs useless artifacts.

With the models and scientists they have, I didn't expect this level of mistakes.