This is decidedly untrue non-fungible item markets (ex - the market where you can only play Sony exclusives on a playstation).
> in markets for non-fungible goods - price formation and demand equilibrium do not rely on a single, continuous market-clearing price. Instead, they rely on discrete matching, asymmetric information, and social coordinates.
Basically - no. Fuck off. Sony is acting in their best interests with asymmetric information (ex - they know how much profit they make of those game sales and you don't, they know how much profit/loss they make from that playstation sale and you don't).
You know how we know? Because absolutely nothing is stopping you from still opting into a model where you don't pay costs up front.
> The problem is assuming everyone wants the hardware costs upfront model.
We have an absolutely smorgasbord of financial services that would LOVE to let you pay over time, or give you a moderate loan, to buy a playstation with low upfront costs... to just list some of the bigger ones: affirm, afterpay, klarna, paypal, zip, bread, upstart, albert, withcherry, etc... there are SO many of these.
You don't get a choice is the issue, more so this is hidden from the consumer that it's occurring.
If when you buy a PS5 you sign a contract saying that you're buying hardware below cost is one thing, but without that contract there is no binding agreement at the time of sale. Without this selling the hardware below cost and you paying for the games is just a really nice thing that Sony hopes happens.