Notes: actual quote is "If you're evil, you're at least competent. And if you're evil, you're not bad. And therefore, maybe you're actually kind of good because you're at least getting something done"
Notes: actual quote is "If you're evil, you're at least competent. And if you're evil, you're not bad. And therefore, maybe you're actually kind of good because you're at least getting something done"
> If you're evil, you're at least competent.
Incompetent evil exists. This statement is wrong, B does not follow A.
> And if you're evil, you're not bad.
They aren't mutually exclusive, so this is incorrect.
> And therefore, maybe you're actually kind of good because you're at least getting something done
This presupposes that "getting something done" is a positive end in itself, which is not a given.
Each phrase is wrong. It's impressive, actually.
both are evil but you can rationalise competent evil coz you're getting something real done like preventing the upending of the moral world order.
Considering weirdness of Thiel believes, his praise and support for actual atrocities, including actually in middle east, trying contrast him with violent religious fanatics is weird. They dont contrast, they have notable similarities.