> What's the argument here?
The most common argument for this is some core unexamined axiom that only humans can reason by definition, and then working backwards to a justification for that.
The most common argument for this is some core unexamined axiom that only humans can reason by definition, and then working backwards to a justification for that.
(I suppose a religious or otherwise superstitious person might introduce the soul into this, but I haven't come across anyone actually willing to defend that hill.)