That’s already the case. Same question is why guns are regulated when killing someone is already illegal.

> Why isn't the publishing of the captured video banned?

It could be, but that's a separate problem. Surreptitiously filming someone can be problematic even if the videos are kept private.

Because you need to do both. Recording creates material that can be damaging and distribution realizes that potential. Banning the first is more effective, banning the second should come with additional penalties because it proves you did the first and then went on to the second presumably willfully ignoring two different legal aspects, creation and distribution.

It probably also is. But easier to enforce at the time of capture.

lol what?

The point is if you’re recording with a handheld device at least you can ensure there is some level of awareness to those around who can duck/signal they don’t want to be in it.

How can you do that with meta glasses?

Get real man.

If it were made illegal then news journalism, documentary filmmaking, sports broadcasting (crowds), street photography, and police-body camera footage would become extinct almost overnight.