Please, send a google translate link where the majority of virologists in a country/language say the genetic evidence points to a lab leak.
I have no idea what “ whether there are still in service or not.” means
I have no idea what “ whether there are still in service or not.” means
Yet the comments here seem to indicate, that that would be not the case from an US-centric perspective even if the publishers in my language claim it comes from the US intelligence agencies. And indeed that seems to be the tenor to a larger percentage in English publications.
> I have no idea what “ whether there are still in service or not.” means
Officials that are still in office seem to it's fringe to say it comes out of a lab, while does that are retired seem to claim, that it is obvious. Even if these are the identical person at different times.
The reality is nobody can say confidently that it did, or that it didn't leak from a lab. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. But what virologists can say with some degree of confidence is that covid was probably NOT the product of genetic manipulation.
So if there's no evidence it was the subject of research, all we are left with is the coincidence of the wet market and the lab being a 40 minute drive away from each other.
Whether covid is the product of genetic manipulation and whether covid was released from a lab, due to an improper safety culture are completely different questions, and nobody has talked about the former question yet.