Invest in nukes especially if you're a resource rich country.
Weapons yes, power seems quite stupid given the costs and lead times.
The answer twenty years ago is not the same as the one today.
What’s the relevance?
The biggest issue is only hinted in the article:
> ‘There’s just enough sun [in January/this winter thus far] to make it work,’ says Olena Kondratiuk
Solar+batteries work well in summer months, but for winter months, solar has much lower output. This is why Russia is attacking thermal plants especially in winter.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/462168/nuclear-reactors-...
France really decimated it's nuclear industry, it takes lot of money and time to restore back capabilities (heavy forging, nuclear grade quality construction) and train people.
Let's not forget that in 2015, French president Hollande promised to slash nuclear's contribution of power generation by 2025.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/renewables-up-nuclear-down-in-fren...
It was really only 2022 Russian invasion, that showed that slowly replacing nuclear power with imported gas was a bad strategy. (This error is still not acknowledged in Germany)
And this still assumes that rebuilding a nuclear industry somehow is an end in itself. It isn't.
The objective is to decarbonize society. Not construt nuclear reactors. We don't have any special obligation to build new nuclear, anymore more than there was an obligation to keep building oil-fired power plants once they stopped making economic sense.
Coal generation was taxed out by EU Emissions Trading System, physical costs of mining lignite in Germany and operating coal power plants are the same as 20 years ago. (and the health impacts are still very negative)
https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/german-regulator-says-n...
> nuclear disappeared
Nuclear in Germany disappeared not for economic reasons, but for political reasons.
" Following a wide public debate, the Atomic Energy Act was amended accordingly on April 22, 2002. The aim was to phase out nuclear energy for the commercial generation of electricity in an orderly manner. To this end, each nuclear power plant was assigned a residual electricity volume such that the total output of the respective plant corresponded to an average 32-year lifetime. The construction of new nuclear power plants was banned altogether. "
https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-phase-out...
The objective in Germany changes over time, in the 2000s it was removing nuclear power from electric grid, without much consideration for CO2 emissions. ( Construction of the last new coal power plant in Germany, Datteln 4, began in November 2007. Entered commercial operation on May 30, 2020)
https://www.powermag.com/germany-brings-last-new-coal-plant-...
Now in 2026, it's slowly removing fossil fuels from electric grid and the whole industry. I say slowly, because state subsidies are already allocated for construction of new gas power plants in Germany.
" Germany will initially hold two sets of auctions for new backup power plants with a combined capacity of 11 gigawatts (GW). Of these, the first tenders (8 September and at the end of December 2026), covering 9 GW, are aimed at so-called "long-term capacity", which is capable of supplying electricity continuously over an extended period, ensuring that even prolonged periods without sufficient renewable energy generation can be covered. It is likely that only gas-fired power plants will be successful in these auctions. Successful bidders receive remuneration for having electricity available once a facility is built, providing the financial incentive needed to invest in the first place. "
https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/germany-passes-law-subs...
Have the hyperscalers fund them, they have an unlimited source of money for AI DCs. Nuclear should be significantly cheaper than space DCs.