Bit hostile. I get the point that it's unnecessary, but the whole "agenda" thing feels kneejerk. Just say that being written in Rust isn't a good enough reason for adoption.
In fact this feels remarkably tame by his standards.
The guy is undoubtedly an exceptional talent. But his communication skills isn’t one of them.
It's the projects shield, and pretty good one at that ;)
Linux went through this evolution with Linus Torvalds, and plenty of other projects have managed to have strong leadership without the hostility.
But you can, it's also a really good way to shy away "over-sensible" individuals, if you think that was rude.....well ;)
>Linux went through this evolution with Linus Torvalds
Not he's still the old one, just without "retro abortion"
You say that like it’s a good thing but it’s really not. All you’re doing is poisoning your own well. Shitting your own bed. And other analogies that emphasise an own goal.
The last thing a project with limited broader appeal, and that appeal diminishing with the homogenisation of POSIX platforms, is someone trying their hardest to make their community even less appealing to others.
> if you think that was rude.....well ;)
Id already said that comment was tame. What I’m saying is that Theo is more generally rude.
Letting toxic one-sided-Snowflakes into your Project is "Shitting you Bed".
>What I’m saying is that Theo is more generally rude.
Nice, that means if he's doing stupid stuff i can be rude too without having to worry that a CoC or even worse a HR department threatens me to resign or publicly state what a horrible person i am.
Wow. Just wow.
You do realise that people are complex and are unlikely to agree with Theo on everything? Even yourself. That doesn’t mean they’re toxic nor one-sided.
And you do realise that constructive engagement requires disagreements and resolutions? That’s what keeps a project healthy.
You do also realise that my original point was comments like yours put off even people who aren’t one sided nor snowflakes? Because actually most people don’t want to be around conflict. So people who act like arseholes tend to only attract more arseholes while normal people will spend their valuable time elsewhere.
The project is lucky that I happen to know some awesome people who are OpenBSD advocates, and met them long before I met people who made comments like yourself, because otherwise I too would have dismissed OpenBSD as a platform not worth my energy. And believe me when I say I’ve written and tested a lot of software for OpenBSD over the last 2 decades.
So this is why I say there’s very real risk of rudeness costing projects valuable contributions. It’s got nothing to do with egos, opinions nor snowflakes. It’s to do with the fact that most people can’t be bothered with conflict. By being rude your self selecting other rude people and filtering out everyone else just in the hope that you also happen to filter out an extreme 1% of people. Which is exactly why I described it as poisoning your own well.
No problem go somewhere else, or bring a good point, no one said you have to agree with Theo on everything.
>Because actually most people don’t want to be around conflict.
That's not a conflict, you are simply to soft and think everything is an attack on you.
>And believe me when I say I’ve written and tested a lot of software for OpenBSD over the last 2 decades.
Ehh that's ok i guess?
>So this is why I say there’s very real risk of rudeness costing projects valuable contributions.
Sometimes risks have to be taken, it's also funny that it's always people who are "potential" contributors but are in fact never the ones who contribute anything.
You and I both know this was never about me, and thus I never thought any of our conversation was a personal attack. But nice try on the trolling.
> it's also funny that it's always people who are "potential" contributors but are in fact never the ones who contribute anything.
Everyone’s a potential contributor until either you scare them off or they hang about and contribute. There’s nothing funny about that. It’s just what those words literally mean.
———
Anyway, I won’t bother replying to you again. I feel you’re just trying to prove my point about Theo now so we’ve reached the conversations natural conclusion.
Sorry to disappoint you though. Hopefully (for you) your next victim gets their feelings hurt. You got to get that dopamine hit somewhere ;)
I said don't be so sensible, don't take everything as a personal attack.
Your conclusion:
>Hopefully (for you) your next victim gets their feelings hurt. You got to get that dopamine hit somewhere
See why it's not good to have people like You in a project?
You’re taking personal shots at someone, then ridiculing them for choosing not to engage with you? All because they thought your hero was a bad ambassador?
From the outside, you’re coming across as the more easily offended.
Thus has exactly the communication style that is required to support the project.
And yes I have been on the end of a Theo quip. It’s a badge of honour because ultimately he was right.
This just comes down to effective communication skills. And is evident by the number of other large projects survive without the rudeness.
Theo isnt an example that deserves emulation and admiration.
I do agree that sometimes you just need to end the discussion. But that doesn’t mean that arsehole comments should be the default character trait.
Or at least that’s our point of contention.