Just went thru the full check out in incognito mode and it works for me.
SaaS is not the website itself. It's paying for risk management. For example, why did you use AWS instead of the wayyyy cheaper server-under-a-desk? At your scale, I bet it would be more than adequate.
If _you_ don't want to self-host something core to your business, think about why. Congrats, you now understand why people pay for SaaS.
It’s still working for me and snappy but I’m in the region it’s hosted it. It’s also hosted on Railway so not sure where you got AWS from.
I saw us-east and assumed it was us-east-1 but it doesn't matter. The same criticism applies to any hosting situation. You _could_ have gone with a cheaper DIY solution but didn't.
I’m curious what you mean by a cheaper DIY solution?
Their main thing, iirc, was detecting ~abnormal~ looking emails. It's the main way companies lose money and IP, it's not via crazy hacks, it's obviously the human element that is the biggest vulnerability in all companies. A stressed employee gets an email saying hey i'm the ceo i'm in a rush, or hey it's totally jennifer from your team i'm stuck outside, send me all the files/do x quickly. I don't have any fucking idea what they're doing now and I bet you they dont either
This must be a response to the cyber stuff from the big labs
Software factories don't exist is an easily falsifiable statement https://github.com/topics/software-factory