Can Subscription Model Save Small-Town Movie Theaters?
latimes.com
latimes.com
The member price for extra viewings and guests is $7 a show, which is the normal price for small town theaters. The price for non-members is $16, which is exceptionally high and will likely dissuade almost all casual visitors. It seems to be a decoy price whose intent is not to sell at that point but to mask that $7 for member tickets is not a bargain, but a normal ticket price.
Theaters make money on popcorn and soda, not tickets.
Under the classic box office model once you have your timed ticket purchased you're guaranteed a seat in the theater. Under this subscription model if there are 200 seats in the theater but 250 subscribers show up for the 5:30 showing then you're going to get some frustrated customers.
How the heck early would I as a subscriber need to arrive for a big box office premier? For art-house/indie theaters I think this model might skirt that problem, though.
The other logical thing, let subscribers vote on up coming movies to bring, if you pick the movie maybe you could get tickets to see it sooner.
According to Wikipedia [1] it has 200.000 subscribers and generates 25% of the revenue.
[1] http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale_cin%C3...
And yet another update: I'm thee right now, waiting for the Hobbit. Apparently they do 3d now, with all new projectors. They're doing even better than I thought...
My wife and I see around 2 movies a month on average, and we probably saw 3-4 a month before we had our 2 year old. If there was a subscription plan that let you see new releases and actually saved you money, we'd most likely do it.