How much of this is due to selective attention on the problems rather than the benefits?
It’s just one person’s story, but I thought this was pretty good:
It’s just one person’s story, but I thought this was pretty good:
For a tool to be deemed useful, the benefits needs to be generally applicable while the cons needs to be accidental or be reduced enough to not be immediately harmful.
There would need to be a lot of studies to show the overall impact. The people dwelling on the harms of AI aren't doing that.