a good way to frame one of AI’s limitations. my answer: because AI has no will. that also conveniently answers why AI won’t (can’t) end humanity. it’s indifferent if you can even call it that.
I'm obviously pointing out the (unsubstantiated) exceptional threat that we're all seemingly worried about: that ASI requires alignment because it'll otherwise cause the end of humanity.
is a promisory threat to the world about a mass displacement labor bomb, nuclear first strike to disable asml and tsmc anthropic openai WHOEVER.
how many countries have nukes?
the cost of developing those is far lower than developing SI, it's a perceivable threat thanks to 'we win'.
France, GB, Russia (good thing we've made a copromise to not protect allies huh), China.
you don't wasn't to rehome these technologies do you?
and we’ve finally done it, it’s the semiconductor factories?
crying? protests?
everyone will want a seat at the table.
I don't see how that follows from a lack of will in AI.
No will needed. Our deaths will be from indifference.