It's not in the comment I'm responding to,

>> Someone above asked me how it was nonsense. I responded that people parotting the point about getting arrested for criticising the king is nonsense

Protesting against the king is criticising the king IMO. I didn't see his quantifier, since I would agree that online critique of the king in particular is not yet penalised.

Not surprising you're implying bad faith though, if we're splitting the hair this thin.

(and this specific planning of the protest was so heavy handed, because it belong to one of the two naughty protests, environmental. The second naughty one is protesting against the genocide. The rest is okay)