Imagine if a car company like Ford or Toyota came out and said their new cars are kind of out of control and they needed special indemnities and protection from liabilities if they want to keep selling cars.
I will be shocked if I live to see a year where AI kills more people than cars do legally.
It's the same even without cars; if you kill someone by accidentally bumping into someone, or running them down with a bicycle, you aren't going to get charged with murder as long as you aren't grossly negligent.
Why do you want an exemption for cars?
> Name one other multi-ton object that you can move through public spaces at high velocities without the law considering it inherently grossly negligent.
That is not the point I replied to.
This is a different point, namely, "Using a car on public roads is, by itself, grossly negligent".
With AI it seems to be internal testing produces wild results, which is unsurprising to me, all of these models can be jailbroken, and as long as that's the case, they're all likely to be exploited maliciously.
I’m repeating it because that has to be internalized: the largest IPO ever will be for a company that casually consider they might kill us all and their own employees too. Including their children.