You left out the quote where I said "[u]nless the rule is unjust." Yes, this does undermine my point somewhat because I'm asking each individual to make a judgement call. I do ask that the level be moved well above "inconvenient to me" towards "bad for society." Mass holocaust? Bad for society, probably shouldn't follow that rule. Turn off your mobile phone because it may reduce the risk of firey death for 170+ people? Good for society, probably should follow that rule.
Nothing I posit takes away your capacity to make decisions. If you can't or won't follow the just rules, as given, then don't partake of whatever requires those rules and, should you feel that passionate, campaign to change those rules. Having 85% of the people following the rules and 15% abusing the system by not following them is neither fair nor equitable. It does serve to desensitize adherence to society in the future.