Hacker News Reader

Comment by IX-103 | Hacker News Reader

Fuschia is not a desktop OS. It's designed for lower end or embedded hardware. Besides, Android has the highly profitable app ecosystem so it makes more financial sense to build GoogleBook based on that.

View on HN

It wasn’t actually. From the docs for Zircon (Fuchsia’s kernel) [0]:

> Zircon targets modern phones and modern personal computers with fast processors, non-trivial amounts of ram with arbitrary peripherals doing open ended computation.

Fuchsia also had a Linux compatibility layer similar to WSL1 at some point. Might still be there?

[0]: https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/concepts/kernel/zx_and_lk

Interesting. Have heard many times that Google has become risk adverse. Maybe fomr something like Android, they just don't want to rock the profitable boat that it has become by switching out the core OS? ... Also now that we're talking, maybe it's just too much work to do so. Backwards compatibility seems like it'd be a nightmare, especially with all the device drivers.

Just because the underlying kernel (Zircon) is designed to be good for both phones and computers doesn’t mean that Fuchsia (which is just an OS that uses that kernel) is.

Fuchsia is the only OS that uses that kernel.

Also, that was an easily citable doc line, but I think a more comprehensive look at the work done in Fuchsia shows it has or had ambitions to run on personal computers.

e.g.: fancy graphics stack, Linux compatibility layer, ideas about OS integrated cloud syncing, the original work on the Xi text editor.

That was the result of not being successful in development and then they shifted to it. It was not like this at beginning or by design.

Do you know what wasn’t successful?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com