Why copyright makes no sense
youtube.com
youtube.com
It's a published book you can buy in hard copy (I bought the ebook on Kindle) but practicing what they preach it's freely available online, http://dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm
The British monarchy created copyright, literally to control what printers were allowed to copy. To enforce this, printing presses were tightly regulated, with severe criminal penalties for operating an unlicensed press. Basically what Big Copyright wants for their own purposes.
Here's a similar discussion from a few weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49622042
Thanks, that is what I thought, but I have never submitted a video.
To the OP, it's there for a reason, don't remove it.
- RIAA bad, Musk good.
- Artists bad, Altman good.
- Authors bad, Amodei good.
I don't like the big AI firms either, but that doesn't mean I'm going to side with literal IP troll outfits.
I guess some people love DRM and further losing control over our owned devices.
I think copyright and patents made sense, make sense, and will continue to make sense, but I also think that as the pace of development accelerates the durations for both need to reduce. The products of intellectual work are valuable and it should be worth investing lots of time and effort into producing it - they just shouldn't be worth that much.