Hacker News Reader

Comment by nialse | Hacker News Reader

I'm going to pick on the example. Love both pi and use mcp, so it's a welcome change. However, I don't want to live in the world where anger is the prioritisation criteria for fixing bugs, and civil conversation about severe issues goes ignored.

    criteria: {
      none: "Neutral, factual, or friendly, even about a serious bug",
      mild: "Explicit annoyance, impatience, or disappointment",
      high: "Clearly angry, exasperated, sarcastic, or fed up",
    },

View on HN

You could turn it on its head and it could be exactly the opposite - that the people who are the most angry, sarcastic, etc are exactly the kind of issues that you should automatically close and ban from creating issues for being non-civilized productive contributors.

Doesn't have to be used for prioritization purposes. Obviously a little annoyance is to be expected at times, but you could explicitly ban egregious angry behavior in your project.

True that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com