> It is definitely not this.

I don't think you understand what "this" is--or rather, the "thing" that didn't happen in "nothing happened".

> Anthropic has thousands of employees making probably > 100,000+ tiny changes across the entire stack and infrastructure everyday.

So, not the sort of thing referred to.

> The compounding effect can definitely cause temporary regressions in some domain or use-case that doesn’t have really good coverage in their internal tests.

Yes, but you claimed that this definitely did happen. But the whole point is to determine whether it did.