Not sure that's why they did it. But that was my experience.
Like who can figure out the ordering? With Luna < Terra < Sol < Astra it's obvious at a glance.
I propose for some third company to name after monsters: Cyclops < Minotaur < Ettin < Cerberus < Hydra < Kraken < Nyarlathotep (the AGI singularity stage)
Then they could probably move to proper nouns: Sagittarius, Andromeda..
Bug < Ticket < Story < Epic < Theme
It.. is?
Many of which are thiccer than our beta ass sun
Pretty badass name tbh
I feel like people who don't get it immediately are just being deliberately obtuse.
The more obvious, to me, interpretation was distance from us so I would've expected Terra -> Luna -> Sol -> Astra.
When I think of space and astronomical scales, I think of distance as much more common concern.
Okay. I don't believe that you got it immediately.
terra, sol == luna, astra
When was the last time you heard anybody say "opus" or "sonnet" before this?
Also it implies that "haikus" are inherently inferior to longer texts which may be kinda frown-inducing..
Fable kind of screwed that up, though.
Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?
Not a lot, but occasionally. I was familiar with the words.
> Also it implies that "haikus" are inherently inferior to longer texts which may be kinda frown-inducing..
It really doesn't.
The one real weakness of Anthropic's naming is that Fable doesn't fit. A fable is typically a fairly short story whereas I think of an opus (if a written work) as being at least a long book and maybe a whole collection of books.
You are serious?
clear would be something like
piss-cheap - it’s-alright-i guess - okay-relax - ouch-my-wallet
I don't think it gets better if you swap "fable" for "myth" either, although when you add "-os" to the end it suddenly sounds grander so there's that. Mythos isn't a model I can use, though.
Honestly, the old boring business lingo of adding Pro and Max suffixes would have been clearer for both companies.
Also, cyclops is assuredly bigger than minotaur in almost any reference. And what's "ettin"?
But the origin is size inflation. The original Starbucks sizes were short and tall. Shorts are still available, in at least a few outlets, despite having not been on the menu for at least 20 years. (For a while a few years ago here in the UK, I even saw short as a column on the menu at one, but that's very rare.) Then they added grande, literally meaning large but maybe meaning more like "extra large". Then when they added an even bigger size, since large was already taken, they just stated the actual size "venti" = 20 (fluid ounces).
(The first time I ever went to a Starbucks had the same confusion as you. I didn't know what an espresso was but at least its sizes of "single" and "double" were easier to understand, so I got a double and was a bit surprised at how small my drink was!)
The smoking gun is how much slower than Sol 6 this is. It's not a retrain.