Nobody is operating on assumptions. They're giving an opinion on a ruling that doesn't directly affect them.

Like, do I just quote this entire thing? "Their ruling is not final yet, per the article. I'm also free to disagree with the correctness and propriety of a judicial ruling and believe it was biased (of course, I do have to still abide by it, to the extent that it applies to me in any way). That it's binding doesn't mean it's right and that it is in accord with the law and/or the constitution."

A wrong ruling isn't in accord with the law. A wrong ruling is binding, at least temporarily, but it's a legal failure.