Hacker News Reader

Why would it be fraudulent if the fee agreement disclosed it?

I understood the OP's point as follows:

The fee agreement was an hourly rate for producing a legal document. The resulting document looks like it took 10 seconds to produce. The lawyer billed $1000 worth of hours.

So, either the document was much more complex than anticipated (in which case the lawyer should have said so), or the lawyer inflated the hours.

They bill with hourly granularity

And that would be fine, if you were getting an hour of their time. If the lawyer spent 10 minutes finding the right template, 10 seconds filling it in, and then 20 minutes proofreading it, then nobody would be complaining.

In reality they'll spend 1 minute grabbing a close-enough template, 10 seconds filling it in, 3 minutes billing you, and 55 minutes double-dipping by doing work for other clients.

Isn't it usually .1 hour increments?

> The fee agreement was an hourly rate for producing a legal document.

We don’t know that for certain.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com