Yeah I find the whole 'what if sufficiently advanced AI gets into the wrong hands' argument extremely tiresome when it's already in the worst possible hands as far as most of the human population is concerned.
I appreciate the sentiment but I feel like there is a lack of creativity and imagination behind that statement.
it was everywhere last week.
i would say, this has been the plot of the graph for at minimum 25 years with the NSA/DHS and data sharing.
we have two primary aggregators currently, the usa and china... all that needs to happen for us to cede humanity is to lose one of them.
we are in a really bad spot right now vs silicon.
edit: spelling.
it's like slandering bitcoin over here you're all heavily unvested.
google kagi yahoo bing duckduckgo yandex archive yadda yadda yadda 'september transcript global ai governance'.
There are some powerful and highly capable evil people. I’m sure they are already stakeholders.
On a question of morals, conventionally bad people generally don’t desire the end of all humanity.