Hacker News Reader

"Better" is subjective. They made it better...for themselves. Then gave it away so people who share their opinion, had the opportunity to choose to use it.

> Then gave it away so people who share their opinion, had the opportunity to choose to use it.

How many neovim users were made aware that the software would proactively delete their decade-long file history?

Probably no more than a rounding error away from zero.

It would be really surprising if they could make it better for literally every user. The perpetual undo is just better handled by git.

And this obligation lasts… for the rest of their lives?