It is a gamble, and they are basing the policy positions on like a RIETI Technical Paper about the ARI, or automation risk index.. Which underneath is based on a bunch of surveys of "experts" to give a number on how automatable, specific actions are, then breaking up a job into a list of actions, and scoring the job for the ARI.. But the methodology that those experts used to make up the numbers is entirely undocumented.. and the assumption is that a whole job, can be automated if all its actions can.. and that a whole .. business and workplace, can just be switched, economically to an automated workflow, without any consideration of how it all has to integrate into everything else.. and other non-automated parts..