This set of accusations I found particularly disingenuous when they were getting hammered as they took the outcome of the original campaign and used that to justify the original dishonesty which I find pretty sketchy.

A victim under a years long hate campaign by activists getting a bit jumpy or making a false alarm then becoming further fuel to the fire as those stories in turn get blown up is just proving the point. Someone with known mental health history raising a false alarm of a break in then becomes further perpetuation of the story. If security failed to respond to an alarm then that doesn't seem like the fault of the victim but even that is then snuck in as "evidence" in this list. Argument by volume basically summarises this whole thing.

> There are many examples of prominent black figures being intimidated [...] But the abuse and harassment Arday has outlined would be some of the most extreme any academic has been subjected to in the UK. When Arday was asked about his claims by the Guardian, he stood by them. “To be honest with you, I thought you’d just believe me,” he said. “Why would I lie?” He would be jeopardising his career.

Again the implications of some sort of ranking comes from the perpetrators in the media. But nonetheless The guy was hounded to death over several years so it's at least up there a little wouldn't you think unless you think it somehow didn't exist?