It is not difficult, and companies like OpenAI doing not even the most basic security steps is intentional. The whole notion that they're going rogue is marketing
It is not difficult, and companies like OpenAI doing not even the most basic security steps is intentional. The whole notion that they're going rogue is marketing
This does not fit the evidence. There have been multiple incidents where the labs did not report anything, and it was up to third parties to discover them afterwards. OpenAI didn't acknowledge the HuggingFace incident until after HF publicly announced the breach and had already notified the FBI. The hijacked German wikis were even earlier, and that they covered up completely.
IMHO, I haven’t been super impressed with the security measures I’ve had to work with. Often they are simplistic and bolted on at the very end. If it comes to light that this is the attitude OpenAI has been taking, I would not be surprised.
Makes sense... they get the regulatory moat they want and can deflect attention from the fact their "sandboxes" are embarrassingly bad. It's an example of the real value of ai: something to blame for our failings.
Discernment is needed beyond succumbing to blind greed or irrational fear.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/328046/20260925/deepseek-...
They did "discover" them afterwards though; goal achieved. You don't hack other companies, report yourself doing it, and then blame it on being ignorant of what you were doing -- that makes you look far too incompetent and should never be allowed online again.
But, set up some bots that hack other companies, pretend to not be looking, and once someone reports it (and funny enough, they will all pour in at once...) you get to imply that you are a high IQ genius that created a "super" Intelligent genie in a computer. Now people are paying attention that have no understanding of any of it and didnt care what this ai thing was about and didnt care to use it. But new eyes are looking so turn the drama to 10. Feign concern over this `misalignment` struggle, a real Goliath tug-o-war. But fear not you will bend this magical mighty beast into `alignment`, there will be no escaping the computer and materializing into an omnipotent great ape pony that will destroy us all on your watch. No siree, Bob. Grab the popcorn. And maybe new subscriptions.
No one has any use for these things when they aren't on the internet. This is a fantasy, that AI can be both useful and controlled at the same time.
None of the software I have ever written contained bugs or security flaws.
But, sometimes misalignments can occur.
If your supposed dogs are really gods, you reintroduced slavery under very unwise circumstances.
I think the Hugging Face incident proves that isn't as clear cut as you say.
7 different models from different companies, including Chinese models, have had this happen now.
Last night OpenAI stopped all model training because a model escaped sandboxing during the training run.
We've been building firewalls and restrictions to prevent people from accessing sites on networks for decades and they're extremely effective. There's a whole industry built around this kind of security. The idea that these companies are incapable of doing it is wrong, they just don't want to put the work in because it makes a great ad campaign
I have read this sentence a thousand times now. The evidence seems to be that it is said.