We don't live in anarchy, or do we? We probably would still have slaves if it would not be so aggressively penalized.
So, how many rogue AIs are we willing to tolerate?
It will balance automatically based on the severity they cause. If they constantly break systems, punishments will go up against the operators and the effect will be similar as with other serious crimes.
Which, in turn, requires that AI oopsie to be survivable.
AI capabilities are rising over time. If there is a limit to just how far they can rise, we're yet to find it. So, a sufficiently advanced "AI oopsie" can solve the AI crime accountability problem for good. Probably not the way you would have wanted it to.
But for other cases, it is not different than other cyber crime. Except that these AI capabilities can't live on the toaster yet. If we get state of the art model running fast on Raspberry Pi, then we have real problems.
Seems hard to think of types of crime for which that's actually true. In the US, at least, it's certainly not true of murder, rape, or other violent crimes. We tolerate quite a lot of that, at least to the extent of never arresting, charging, and convicting anyone.
And it is most definitely not true of non-violent "white collar" financial crime.