The longer a text, the more entropy, the easier it is to classify. Novels are pretty long. So I suspect the false positive rate for books is far lower than for articles. And, as I said, we also have corroborating evidence now in form of cases of plagiarism discovered in his past work. Someone who has no qualms about committing plagiarism is more likely to also not have inhibitions about using LLMs to write books.
They tested passages. It is absolutely trivial to find passages that pangram classifies as 100% ai gen even if it's not the case.
I don't think it's trivial. I'm also pretty sure many people have tested the whole book.
Where? Can you post a link?
This story is international news. It is extremely likely that many people have checked the full book using Pangram. I need not post a link for that.
It's not extremely likely, you definitely need a link to back this claim.